$LULUBearishMed

Michael Burry Sees Echoes Of His 2019 GameStop Bet In Lululemon: 'The Last Time I Owned A Stock As Hated.

Michael Burry said on X that the last time he owned a stock as “hated” as Lululemon (LULU) was GameStop in 2019. Lululemon shares fell 8.56% to $114.23 after Q1 revenue of $2.47B beat estimates but the company cut its fiscal 2026 EPS forecast to $10.95–$11.15 from $12.10–$12.30, citing weak North America demand and margin pressure.

8/10
8/10
Med
Bearish
after Friday earnings/guidance reaction
risk-off for retail/apparel; guidance cut reinforces negative sentiment

Earnings/guidance reset signals weaker demand and margin pressure, likely keeping downside risk elevated near-term.

Lululemon shares plunged after earnings, with management cutting its fiscal 2026 earnings forecast and guiding Q2 below expectations.

Bearish bias; rallies may face selling until demand/margin stabilization is evidenced.

Background

Michael Burry compared Lululemon to his 2019 GameStop contrarian bet, framing the market’s skepticism versus longer-term prospects.

Why it matters

The actionable driver is the earnings package: forecast cut, weak Q2 outlook, North America softness, and margin compression from tariff costs and markdowns.

Market relevance

Traders should treat this as a guidance-driven repricing event with near-term demand and margin uncertainty, partially offset by stronger China momentum.

Market effects

Adds to evidence that premium apparel faces demand softness and tariff/margin headwinds, pressuring valuation multiples across discretionary retail.

North America weakness is highlighted (revenue -3% YoY), while China growth (+30% Mainland China revenue) may shift relative investor focus to Asia exposure.

Tariff-related cost pressure is a cross-border margin risk, potentially affecting other retailers with similar supply chains.

Alternative perspectives

China growth (+30% Mainland China revenue) and a still-profitable brand could support a rebound if North America stabilizes faster than feared.

The article attributes margin compression to tariff-related costs and fixed-cost deleveraging; if tariffs ease or inventory/markdowns normalize, the earnings trajectory could improve even without immediate demand re-acceleration.

Key entities

  • Lululemon

    Athleisure apparel maker whose earnings and guidance triggered an 8.56% share drop and a fiscal 2026 earnings forecast cut.

  • Michael Burry

    Investor who posted a GameStop-era comparison to Lululemon on X.

Related articles

$LULUMedAI 8/10

Lululemon Shares Dropped After the Company Cut Its Annual Forecast. Is the Stock a Buy Amid the Selloff?

Lululemon reported fiscal 2026 Q1 revenue of $2.47B (up from $2.37B) but net income fell 38% to $195M and EPS was $1.69 vs. $2.60 a year earlier, as gross profit and margins declined. The company cut full-year guidance to $11.0B–$11.15B revenue and EPS $10.95–$11.15, citing headwinds and weaker U.S. sales. Shares fell over 12% post-earnings; analysts cited margin pressure and incoming CEO Heidi O’Neill in September.

$LULUMedAI 8/10

Can Lululemon Stocks Stage a Turnaround, or Is It Time to Throw in the Towel?

Lululemon (LULU) shares fell further after the company lowered full-year guidance following fiscal Q1 results, citing moderating sales trends. Q1 revenue rose 4% to $2.47B, but adjusted EPS fell 35% to $1.69. Lululemon now expects FY sales of $11.0–$11.15B and adjusted EPS of $10.95–$11.15. Gross margin is expected to decline. CEO Heidi O’Neill starts in September.

$LULUMedAI 8/10

LULU Stock Falls After Lululemon Cuts Annual Guidance

Lululemon (LULU) shares fell after the company cut its annual guidance, following commentary on its earnings call that investors viewed as broadly disappointing, according to the article. The piece also suggests that similar downward revisions may follow from other analysts, though it attributes this to expectations rather than a specific new forecast.

$LULUHighAI 9/10

lululemon athletica Q1 Earnings Call Highlights

lululemon athletica said China Mainland growth benefited from a Chinese New Year shift into Q1, adding 8 percentage points, but momentum slowed late in the quarter as negative commentary rose, then eased, according to interim co-CEO André Maestrini. Management cited product updates and higher marketing spend, but said a “new look of yoga” campaign missed expected top-line impact. Q1 gross margin fell to 54.2% (from 58.3%); Q1 EPS was $1.69 vs $2.60. The company cut Q2 revenue guidance to $2.45–$