Other Barks & Bites for Friday, September 25: UPC Will Hear Noninfringement Claim to Pre-Issue Patent; DEFEND IP Act Introduced to Target Foreign Piracy Sites; and Judge Rogers Dissents from D.C. Circuit’s Royalty Allocation Ruling
Qualcomm extended its patent license agreement with Apple, effective April 2021. The USPTO appointed Jonathan Spencer as Chief AI Officer. The DEFEND IP Act was introduced to target foreign piracy sites. The UPC Court of Appeal ruled on noninfringement challenges for yet-to-issue patents. The Third Circuit dismissed a copyright claim over allegedly copied curriculum.
How this was made

The 30-second read
Why it matters
While each item is individually modest, together they signal heightened activity in IP enforcement and licensing, which may influence investor sentiment toward tech and semiconductor stocks.
Market read
Primarily relevant to US‑listed tech and semiconductor companies with active patent licensing arrangements.
What to watch
Potential downstream effects on smaller IP‑focused startups and international licensing agreements are not discussed.
Background
The article aggregates recent IP‑related legal and regulatory developments, including a new anti‑piracy bill, court decisions on patent jurisdiction, and corporate licensing updates.
Ticker impact
Oracle sent a force majeure notice for its New Mexico data center project due to regulatory hurdles.
Minor short‑term downside pressure if investors anticipate cost overruns.
Force majeure notices are uncommon and signal possible supply‑chain or permitting issues.
Qualcomm announced it is extending its patent license agreement with Apple effective April 1 next year.
Neutral to slightly positive as the deal removes uncertainty.
Continuity of licensing revenue is viewed favorably by investors.
Apple will continue its patent license agreement with Qualcomm starting April 1.
No material impact on Apple’s stock price.
The news confirms status quo rather than introducing new risk or benefit.
Market effects
Highlights ongoing regulatory scrutiny in the tech/IP space and continued licensing activity in semiconductors.
US‑based companies may see modest short‑term volatility in response to the new DEFEND IP bill and court rulings.
Limited; primarily affects US‑listed tech firms and IP‑related legal landscape.
Counterpoint
The DEFEND IP Act could ultimately benefit content platforms by clarifying enforcement, offsetting any short‑term negative sentiment for tech firms.
Key entities
- LegislationDEFEND IP Act
Proposed U.S. bill targeting foreign piracy websites.
- Judicial BodyUnified Patent Court
EU court ruling on pre‑grant non‑infringement claims.


