Apple has offered a commission of up to 15% for purchases made through external links in
Apple filed a proposal in U.S. District Court (Northern District of California) on commissions for purchases made via external links in iOS apps. It proposes 15% for standard apps, 5% for small business developers, and 10% for Video, News, and Mini Apps partner programs, plus 10% for subscription renewals. The filing follows Apple’s dispute with Epic Games over App Store commissions.
How this was made

The 30-second read
Why it matters
A proposed commission schedule (15% standard, 5% small developers, 10% partner programs, 10% subscription renewals) is a concrete litigation development that may affect expectations for App Store fee outcomes and developer economics.
Market read
This is a new, concrete legal filing that updates the expected App Store fee framework under external-link purchases, but without an immediate court decision.
What to watch
Traders may be underweighting the procedural posture: the Supreme Court denial of a stay increases the chance of near-term lower-court rulings that could override the proposal.
Background
The filing is tied to Apple’s long-running legal dispute with Epic Games over App Store commission and external-link policies.
Ticker impact
Apple filed a Northern District of California proposal to set App Store external-link commissions at 15%, with 5% for small developers and 10% for partner programs.
Near-term impact likely limited unless the filing signals a faster path to a favorable ruling or changes expected App Store take rates.
The article reports a fresh court filing and proposed rates, but it does not include a ruling, settlement, or immediate implementation timeline.
Market effects
App-store commission structures are a key input for mobile software monetization; changes can affect developer margins and platform competition expectations.
Primarily US legal/regulatory risk, with potential spillover to global app-economy policy debates.
Could influence how regulators and courts view platform fees and external-link policies beyond the US case.
Counterpoint
Even if the proposed rates are lower than the previously challenged 27%, courts may still view external-link restrictions as anti-competitive, limiting the filing’s practical benefit.
Key entities
- companyApple
Filed a proposal in the Northern District of California to set App Store external-link commission rates.
- companyEpic Games
Opposing party in the long-running dispute over App Store commission and external-link policies.
- governmentU.S. Supreme Court
Denied Apple’s motion to stay further proceedings, prompting the new proposal filing.





