Apple proposes to take a 15% cut of purchases made outside the App Store
Apple filed in U.S. District Court (N.D. California) proposing commissions on iOS purchases made via external links in apps. It proposes a 15% standard rate, 5% for small businesses, 10% for developers in Apple partner programs, and 10% for subscription renewals. The filing follows the Supreme Court’s refusal to pause proceedings in Apple v. Epic.
How this was made

The 30-second read
Why it matters
Apple’s filing specifies proposed commission rates for purchases made via external links in iOS apps, after the Supreme Court rejected Apple’s request to pause further lower-court proceedings.
Market read
Traders can update Apple’s legal-case timeline and the economic terms Apple is willing to propose for external-link transactions, which may influence perceived litigation risk and developer ecosystem expectations.
What to watch
Market reaction may hinge on whether the proposed rates are viewed as aligning with or diverging from Google Play link-out norms, and on the next procedural milestone in the Epic case.
Background
Apple and Epic Games have been in a years-long dispute over App Store commission and link-out rules; Apple sought to pause lower-court action pending a Supreme Court decision.
Ticker impact
Apple filed in U.S. court proposing 15% commissions for purchases via external links, with 5% for small developers and 10% for certain programs.
Near-term sentiment likely neutral to slightly negative for Apple if the market views the proposal as conceding or escalating the Epic-related dispute, but the impact depends on how courts interpret the structure.
This is a fresh regulatory/legal filing with specific commission rates, but the article does not include a settlement, court ruling, or immediate operational change beyond the proposed structure.
Market effects
Reinforces ongoing scrutiny of App Store commission practices, which can affect broader platform economics and developer sentiment across mobile ecosystems.
Primarily U.S. legal process, but can influence global developer behavior and regulatory attention.
Could be read across to other jurisdictions’ app-store commission debates and competition policy discussions.
Counterpoint
Investors may treat the proposal as a tactical litigation step rather than a substantive change, limiting equity impact until a court ruling or settlement emerges.
Key entities
- companyApple
Filed a proposed commission structure for external-link purchases in iOS apps in Northern District of California.
- companyEpic Games
Opposing party in the App Store commission dispute; referenced via prior agreement to Google Play rates.





