$IYW

iShares U.S. Technology ETF

No enriched coverage for $IYW in the last 7 days.

Low

State Street Technology ETF vs iShares Technology ETF

The article compares two technology ETFs: iShares Technology ETF (IYW) and State Street Technology ETF (XLK). Over the past five and ten years, both funds have similar total returns, with XLK slightly ahead in the short term and IYW in the long term. XLK has lower fees (0.08% vs. 0.37%), a higher dividend yield (0.41% vs. 0.09%), and larger assets ($131.1B vs. $27.2B). XLK excludes Alphabet and Meta Platforms, which are included in IYW.

iShares Dow Jones Technology Sector ETF (IYW) Stock News & Articles

The article is a roundup of recent moves in AI server and tech stocks within the iShares Dow Jones Technology Sector ETF (IYW) universe. It cites Super Micro Computer’s guidance and preliminary results driving large gains, alongside Dell and Hewlett Packard Enterprise rising on AI server read-through. It references Super Micro’s disclosed $60B order backlog and margin beat.

XLK vs. IYW: State Street Tech ETF Tops iShares Fund in Cost

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) both track U.S. technology exposure but differ in cost and breadth. XLK charges a 0.08% expense ratio versus IYW’s 0.38%, and yields 0.37% versus 0.11% (trailing 12 months). XLK holds 73 stocks; IYW holds 139. Both reported similar 1-year returns (~49% vs ~48%).

IYW sentiment & insider activity

Recent IYW coverage spans financial news, market movers and sector analysis.

What's driving IYW

  • Higher costs could deter some investors, but no immediate price move expected.

    finance.yahoo.com · Oct 6, 2026

  • The article is a roundup of recent moves in AI server and tech stocks within the iShares Dow Jones Technology Sector ETF (IYW) universe. It cites Super Micro Computer’s guidance and preliminary results driving large gains, alongside Dell and Hewlett Packard Enterprise rising on AI server read-through. It references Super Micro’s disclosed $60B order backlog and margin beat.

    247wallst.com · Aug 12, 2026

  • State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) both track U.S. technology exposure but differ in cost and breadth. XLK charges a 0.08% expense ratio versus IYW’s 0.38%, and yields 0.37% versus 0.11% (trailing 12 months). XLK holds 73 stocks; IYW holds 139. Both reported similar 1-year returns (~49% vs ~48%).

    finance.yahoo.com · May 28, 2026

AlphAI scores every news story that mentions IYW with an AI model for sentiment and relevance, and aggregates insider trades from iShares U.S. Technology ETF's SEC EDGAR Form 4 filings. Figures refresh continuously.

News on $IYW

Score

State Street Technology ETF vs iShares Technology ETF

The article compares two technology ETFs: iShares Technology ETF (IYW) and State Street Technology ETF (XLK). Over the past five and ten years, both funds have similar total returns, with XLK slightly ahead in the short term and IYW in the long term. XLK has lower fees (0.08% vs. 0.37%), a higher dividend yield (0.41% vs. 0.09%), and larger assets ($131.1B vs. $27.2B). XLK excludes Alphabet and Meta Platforms, which are included in IYW.

$SMCILow

iShares Dow Jones Technology Sector ETF (IYW) Stock News & Articles

The article is a roundup of recent moves in AI server and tech stocks within the iShares Dow Jones Technology Sector ETF (IYW) universe. It cites Super Micro Computer’s guidance and preliminary results driving large gains, alongside Dell and Hewlett Packard Enterprise rising on AI server read-through. It references Super Micro’s disclosed $60B order backlog and margin beat.

XLK vs. IYW: State Street Tech ETF Tops iShares Fund in Cost

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) both track U.S. technology exposure but differ in cost and breadth. XLK charges a 0.08% expense ratio versus IYW’s 0.38%, and yields 0.37% versus 0.11% (trailing 12 months). XLK holds 73 stocks; IYW holds 139. Both reported similar 1-year returns (~49% vs ~48%).